The Institute for Action Against Discrimination (IFAAD) has expressed profound shock and disappointment following the Private Sector Commission’s (PSC) public endorsement of the Elections Commission Chairman’s decision to reject the use of electronic biometrics in voter registration and polling for the upcoming elections. IFAAD sees this as a grave missed opportunity to modernise the electoral process and strengthen the democratic system, calling the decision a step backward in efforts to ensure fair, transparent, and accountable elections.
In a statement, IFAAD’s Vice Chairman, former Georgetown mayor Pt. Ubraj Narine, condemned the PSC’s stance, emphasizing that electronic biometrics have proven to be a reliable tool for combating voter fraud, ensuring precise voter identification, and boosting public trust in election outcomes.
“The refusal to implement electronic biometrics signals a step backwards in efforts to improve the democratic process,” Narine said. “It is even more disappointing to see the Private Sector Commission, a body that should champion progressive policies, endorsing such a decision. This position is against the urgent need for electoral modernization and undermines efforts to secure free, fair, and credible elections in the future.”
IFAAD also questioned the PSC’s commitment to strengthening democratic institutions and ensuring accountability in the electoral system. By supporting the rejection of electronic biometrics, the PSC is, in their view, endorsing outdated practices that undermine the credibility of elections and hinder much-needed reforms.
The situation was made even more critical when the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) shocked the nation last week by publicly announcing that it would not use biometric technology in the upcoming elections. This decision sent shockwaves through society, with many viewing it as a significant setback for electoral integrity. The announcement has reignited calls for urgent reforms to ensure that the upcoming elections are both fair and credible.
In response, IFAAD has also sharply criticised GECOM Chairman Claudette Singh for failing to deliver on the promise of modernizing the country’s electoral process. “Chairman Singh’s inability to implement electronic biometrics is a clear failure in leadership,” said Narine.
“Her decision not only compromises the integrity of the electoral system but also ignores the growing demand from citizens and organizations for reform. This is a missed opportunity to restore public confidence in the electoral process.”
IFAAD is calling on all stakeholders—including civil society organisations, international partners, and concerned citizens—to unite in demanding the adoption of modern, effective electoral practices. They assert that the integrity of the nation’s democracy depends on its ability to evolve in line with global standards, ensuring that every voter’s voice is heard and fairly represented.
In conclusion, the Institute for Action Against Discrimination urges both the Private Sector Commission and the Elections Commission to reconsider their stance and embrace reforms that will safeguard the credibility of elections for future generations.
IFAAD says it remains steadfast in its commitment to promoting policies that advance inclusivity, transparency, and justice in democratic processes. Only through such reforms can Guyana ensure that the electoral system is truly reflective of the will of its people, the agency assures.
