Sunday, July 26, 2026
Village Voice News
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Village Voice News
No Result
View All Result
Home Op-ed

Sexual Offenders’ Registry -Pt III (who is/was being shielded)?

Admin by Admin
June 14, 2026
in Op-ed
GHK Lall

GHK Lall

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By GHK Lall- Things come together. The pieces form a whole. They tell a political horror story. Straight from the mouth of the Ministry of Human Services and Social Security came a number: 584. In 5 years, there were 584 instances of underaged pregnancies. In harsher words: 584 real cases of statutory rape. Over two statutory rapes a week, for five years, which leads to several thoughts, all discomforting. Moving along.

I invite Dr. Clifton Hicken, Top Cop, to enlighten the public. Please share the number charged with that offense in the last five years. News of statutory rapes usually hit the media early, sharply, efficiently. If there have been 84 reports of charges laid, those would be more than seen in all of Guyana’s media combined. A mere 84, not as much as 584 of such instances. This isn’t speculation, or guesswork.

READ ALSO

Don’t Be Fooled: Amerindian Lives Demand Justice, Not Promises

In Open Letter Season: Mine to AG Nandlall

It’s the 584 pregnancies the ministry revealed. Would help immensely if the Commissioner, Dr. Hicken, provides the list of those charged in the last five years with the heinous offense of statutory rape. Surely, that doesn’t rise to the level of protected information, that a blanket of secrecy is best in the circumstance. Names of accused are all that’s sought; not those of victims. Not even locations of the crimes. I can’t say alleged crimes. For there were those underage pregnancies, weren’t they? And that requires a rapist. Because there are those victimized young daughters of Guyana.

I proceed further, with three subsidiary inquiries. What about those statutory rapes that didn’t result in a pregnancy? Or, those that did, but were not reported? To avoid the horror of family stigma. To give a young child a second chance in life, and not burdened her throughout life with that inerasable blotch. There’s still that third inquiry. What about those situations where some sleazy business was transacted, when those who needed their involvement and identity kept secret, paid in dollars for their crimes?

The 584 instances of underage pregnancies, in all probability, would be much higher. In this country, in its ugly circumstances, in its governance, in its disfiguring developments in high places and low places, secrecy ranks among what’s most prized. Inevitably, this brings to the Sexual Offenders’ Registry and that determined effort by the PPP Govt to keep it secret.

What does that say, fellow citizens? What message does a secret Sexual Offenders’ Registry convey? There are people (scumbags) to be protected. There are many such lowlifes to be given immunity. When the PPP Govt boasts (rightly) about its work to initiate a Sexual Offenders’ Registry, but was then tricky enough to keep the identities of the offenders’ secret, what was going on there? I get rid of something. The PPP Govt is not in the business of protecting political opponents and those who expose it. The PNC is out. WIN is out.

So, also, would be conscientious Guyanese objectors. They would be buried alive should they be involved in a statutory rape. So, who were the criminals that the PPP Govt was looking to protect by having a secret sex offenders’ registry? Before moving forward, a reminder for Guyanese. There are those who have committed statutory rape, but represented much political use to the PPP Govt. Thus, they are in that special place: breakers of the law now among the makers of laws.

The question returns. Why did the PPP Govt felt it wise, saw it as helpful, to introduce a secret Sexual Offenders’ Registry? There must be powerful perps to protect. A significant constituency to secure. I think of custom and practice. I think, in all this, of those who don’t count, other than when being used. And abused.

So, when word came of Pres Ali and VP Jagdeo galloping into town, like John Wayne and Clint Eastwood, three conclusions came. With public rage inflamed, the closed registry had to be opened. Second, it had to be, because their own supporters were hopping mad; they know pain and shame. Third, the game was up. The secret Sexual Offenders’ Registry is now to be public. Such is Guyana. This is one example of how the calculating suddenly discovers courage.

ShareTweetSendShareSend

Related Posts

Egland Gomes
Op-ed

Don’t Be Fooled: Amerindian Lives Demand Justice, Not Promises

by Admin
July 25, 2026

By Egland Gomes- Fellow Guyanese at home and across the diaspora, let us send a clear message: we will not...

Read moreDetails
L-R AG Anil Nandlall, GHK Lall
Op-ed

In Open Letter Season: Mine to AG Nandlall

by Admin
July 25, 2026

By GHK Lall-Guyana is engulfed in grief.  Adding to that grief are the graphic images.  A female conscientious objector arrested. ...

Read moreDetails
Op-ed

We Watched the Prayer Service From the Back and Were Disgusted

by Staff Writer
July 23, 2026

My friends and I stood on the periphery of that prayer service yesterday, undecided about whether we truly wanted to...

Read moreDetails
Next Post
Karen Abrams, Founder and Executive Director STEMGuyana

Guyana's Oil Wealth Yet to Deliver Greater Competition, Better Service and Lower Prices — Dr. Abrams


EDITOR'S PICK

Arrested: Ganesh Sewcharran

Attempted murder suspect intercepted at US Airport 

September 15, 2021
(Winner) Ms. Rosana Thomas and Mr. Andre Wilson_ Project Field Office

GGI-Funded Enhancing Community Wellness Project Celebrates Wellness Challenge Winner

October 8, 2023
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning

China has no choice but to take countermeasures in response to India’s unfair treatment of Chinese journalists: FM spokesperson

April 7, 2023
Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham (1923-1985)

Nation Builder: Revisiting Burnham’s Transformative Leadership

February 22, 2026

© 2024 Village Voice

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Village Voice