Victoria, Guyana – Chairman of the Haslington/Grove Neighbourhood Democratic Council (NDC), Michael Spencer, has issued a heartfelt and urgent appeal to the residents of Victoria, calling for unity and vigilance against what he describes as systemic neglect and poor governance affecting the historic community.
In a strongly worded statement, Spencer lamented the challenges facing Victoria, commonly referred to as the “Mother of All Villages,” and raised concerns over what he sees as deliberate efforts to sideline the village’s interests. He pointed to critical issues such as deteriorating infrastructure, inadequate public services, and questionable land sales to outsiders as signs of a broader problem that must be confronted.
“For all my life, I know Victoria has been divided by sections, but never politically,” Spencer wrote. “Before assuming office as chairman, I was attached to the Haslington/Grove NDC as a regional representative, where I raised concerns about our village—from the community center to water issues, from the Victoria Primary School to Lady Sandal Park, and even the selling of land to outsiders. I was talking too much, irritating some people’s demons.”
Spencer alleged that as a result of his outspoken advocacy, he was transferred to the Unity NDC without formal notice, an act he believes was intended to silence him. Now, as chairman, he asserts that he can finally speak freely, joining a long line of community leaders whose warnings about Victoria’s neglect were dismissed.
“Victoria, in particular, is not in the best interest of the council. Unless we wake up early enough, we’ll be doomed,” he warned.
While acknowledging some recent improvements, Spencer cautioned against complacency, citing instances of incomplete projects and substandard work. He expressed frustration over last-minute decision-making forced upon him due to the failures of those responsible. One such example was the delayed preparation of the community center ground for school sports, which led him to personally seek the help of young residents—only for their efforts to be met with criticism.
“The fight and struggles are real,” he declared, calling on Victorians to unite and demand better governance.
Spencer’s statement signals an emerging battle between community advocates and local authorities over the future of Victoria. As he promises a follow-up message in “Part Two,” residents are left to consider how they will respond to his call for action.
The unfolding developments in Victoria raise pressing questions about governance, accountability, and the village’s long-term future—issues that, according to Spencer, can no longer be ignored.
