A few days ago, President Irfaan Ali took to social media to discuss what he termed the “egotistical characters” in society. While his observations may have resonated with many, it’s hard not to see the irony in his words. It seems the President was, perhaps, describing himself—unwittingly giving a candid view of his own persona and the conduct of his government.
President Ali, in his broadcast, spoke of egotistical individuals who act as if the world revolves around them, showing little regard for the perspectives and rights of others.
Yet, if we look at his actions over the past few years, it becomes clear that he embodies many of the traits he condemned. His government has been marked by an attitude of exclusion and self-interest—traits that seem to define an egotistical character.
Let’s start with the issue of overriding local authorities, specifically municipalities and NDCs (Neighbourhood Democratic Councils) that are controlled by the opposition.
The Ali administration has consistently ignored the elected representatives of these bodies, often making decisions unilaterally. This is not just a case of governmental overreach, but a clear indication of disregard for the democratic principles of consultation and cooperation. It’s as if the administration believes it has the right to impose its will, regardless of the political opposition or the will of the people.
Equally concerning is the discriminatory approach the government has taken when it comes to the distribution of industrial lands. Despite calls for a fair and transparent process, there are growing concerns that the distribution of these valuable resources has been skewed in favour of those loyal to the ruling party. This policy does not only undermine fairness but also promotes a system of friends, family and favoritism, alienating those who do not align with the government.
And then there’s the issue of constant exclusion of the opposition from meaningful engagement on national affairs. The government has frequently been criticized for its refusal to consult with the opposition, sidelining them from key decisions that affect the country’s future. This sort of exclusionary behaviour, where dissenting voices are disregarded, reeks of an egotistical desire to silence opposition rather than engage in constructive dialogue for the betterment of the nation.
The wasteful and lawless spending of taxpayer money is another glaring example of the egotistical mindset at play. Under President Ali’s leadership, public funds, including oil revenues, have been spent with little accountability or transparency. The people of Guyana are left to wonder how their hard-earned taxes are being used, as the government seems more focused on grandiose projects and self-aggrandizement than on addressing the needs of the populace.
We also cannot forget the numerous incidents of alleged misconduct that have further reinforced the image of an egotistical leader. One such incident, which many might recall, was the video that surfaced showing President Ali physically roughing up his own bodyguard. This display of aggression and disrespect was not just an isolated incident; it was a reflection of the authoritarian tendencies that often accompany those who feel they are above reproach.
The appointment of a new Commissioner of Police—someone who has already surpassed the official retirement age—further illustrates this government’s disregard for the law and proper governance. It’s almost as though the President and his administration feel entitled to bend the rules for their own benefit, showing a blatant disregard for merit-based appointments and the public’s trust in such key institutions.
In light of all this, it is hard to see President Ali’s recent remarks as anything but a reflection of the very egotistical behaviors he claims to despise. His administration’s actions seem to mirror the traits of a leader who seeks control, who ignores opposition, and who operates without accountability. As the President himself noted, egotistical characters in society tend to believe they are the center of everything—perhaps he should reflect on these words, as they seem to speak to the very essence of his own governance.
Egotistical behaviour may seem powerful in the short term. If the President truly seeks to address egotistical conduct, he should start by looking in the mirror and changing the culture within his own government. Only then can we hope for a future where the needs and voices of all the people are heard, and where governance is guided by integrity and fairness, not egotism.
