Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice.
By Mark DaCosta- Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo has falsely stated the cash grant transfer/initiative, promising $100,000 to every adult citizen, is an original concept of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP). The claim was made at his press conference last Thursday, October 17, 2024. The vice president’s assertion continues to be met with widespread scepticism, as substantial evidence indicates the idea was first championed by the Alliance for Change (AFC) and economist Professor Clive Thomas, raising questions about Jagdeo’s integrity and his claim.
The backdrop of this whole thing is rooted way back in an AFC’s White Paper submitted in 2017 to the A Partnership for National Unity and Alliance for Change (APNU+AFC) Cabinet, a copy Village Voice News has seen. The Paper aimed to introduce direct financial support to households as a strategy to alleviate poverty in our nation. The AFC’s comprehensive plan advocated for a generous cash transfer of $500,000 per household, arguing that empowering citizens with financial resources would enable them to meet their immediate needs and escape the poverty trap. This proposal was not just a theoretical exercise; it reflected a pressing need for social equity amid growing disparities exacerbated by economic challenges.
And another thing, way back in 2018, Professor Clive Thomas, the world-respected economist and member of the Working People Alliance (WPA), further advanced the conversation by proposing an annual cash transfer of US$5,000 per household, funded through Guyana’s burgeoning oil revenues. This idea garnered significant support from various sectors, including civil society, trade unions, and political groups, highlighting a broad consensus on the necessity of distributing the nation’s wealth equitably. The AFC praised Thomas’s proposal as a critical step towards ensuring that the benefits of the oil boom reached the most vulnerable populations, reinforcing their ongoing advocacy for social justice.
Against this historical backdrop, Jagdeo’s insistence that the cash grant initiative is a PPP original appears increasingly disingenuous. In an effort to bolster his argument, he showcased a video of former Finance Minister Winston Jordan from the opposition APNU Coalition, who had previously dismissed cash transfers as impractical. Jagdeo asserted, “This was part of our manifesto; it was not a product of anyone else’s ideas,” implying that the PPP had independently conceived the cash grant initiative.
However, this narrative becomes more complicated when considering President Irfaan Ali’s own statement In mid-January 2023, Ali strongly opposed the idea of distributing oil revenues directly to households, describing it as one of the worst things the government could do.
The president warned that such a cash distribution could lead Guyana down the path of Dutch Disease, a scenario where a resource-rich economy suffers from neglect of other sectors. Ali stressed that the government’s focus should be on strategic investments in infrastructure, healthcare, and education rather than short-term financial handouts. His comments from a press conference reflected a clear stance against the populist allure of cash transfers, underscoring the PPP’s previous reluctance to endorse such measures.
Jagdeo’s claims thus appear to clash not only with the documented history of cash transfer proposals but also with the current administration’s own rhetoric. It seems the PPP is attempting to align itself with an initiative that it once absolutely rejected, leading to understandable accusations of hypocrisy and political opportunism on the part of the PPP regime. Moreover, the absence of a clear regulatory framework to govern the cash transfer initiative has raised alarms, considering numerous corruption allegations.
As the public discourse unfolds, it is clear that Jagdeo’s portrayal of the cash grant initiative as a PPP original is at odds with the historical contributions from the AFC and Professor Thomas, and many other less well-known people. The narrative of ownership the PPP seeks to establish appears to be less about genuine commitment to social support and more about political expediency. Simply put, many Guyanese have said directly to Village Voice News that the Vice President appears to be attempting to rewrite history, even in the face of overwhelming evidence of his misleading narrative.
While Jagdeo continues to assert that the cash grant initiative is the PPP’s brainchild, the reality is – say many people – that the idea has deeper roots within the political landscape of our nation. The contributions from the AFC and the insights from economists like Thomas cannot be overlooked. As the Guyanese people engage with these issues, they remain acutely aware of the historical context of the PPP and Vice President Jagdeo, and the PPP’s track record of revising narratives to suit their agenda. Ultimately, as the popular refrain suggests, “That may be all we need to know.”
