Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice.
The Guyana Association of Women Lawyers (GAWL) has taken a strong stance against recent attacks on the judiciary, emphasizing the importance of maintaining respect for the judicial system. In response to comments made by Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs, Anil Nandlall SC, regarding a ruling made by Magistrate Leron Daly, the GAWL has expressed concern and called for prudence and respect in dealing with judicial matters. The association, guided by its motto “Women supporting justice and equality,” has voiced its support for the independent functioning of the judiciary and emphasized the need to preserve public confidence in judicial officers and the judiciary as a whole.
The GAWL’s statement highlights the significance of allowing members of the judiciary to perform their duties independently, without undue influence or disparaging remarks. It underscores the potential consequences of attacks on judicial officers, which can undermine public confidence in the judiciary and impede the fair administration of justice. By widening the scope of negative comments through various media platforms, these attacks can have far-reaching repercussions. The GAWL, therefore, stands firmly against such attacks and urges the public to refrain from disseminating information that could tarnish the reputation of judicial officers and erode public trust.
While recognizing the right to free speech, the GAWL emphasizes that expressions must remain within the boundaries of the law and be mindful of their contextual implications. Respecting the rule of law is essential for a harmonious and just society, and the GAWL asserts that all professionals, including members of the judiciary, should be accorded the respect they deserve in the course of their duty. By upholding the rule of law and maintaining respect for the judiciary, we contribute to the preservation of a fair and equitable society.
The GAWL’s statement comes in response to Attorney General Anil Nandlall’s criticism of Magistrate Daly’s decision in the case involving former Finance Minister Winston Jordan. Nandlall expressed his disagreement with the ruling and referred to a precedent set by the acting Chief Justice, which he believed would have strengthened the prosecution’s case. The GAWL acknowledges that disagreements and debates may arise within the legal realm, but it calls for a measured and respectful approach, recognizing the efforts of judicial officers who strive to maintain the rule of law.