The People’s National Congress Reform (PNCR) is scheduled to have its Delegates’ Congress this year which could see changing of key figures in the hierarchy of the party. In a recent letter observed on various social media platforms there is a call for the resignation or removal of former President and Leader of the party, Brigadier (ret’d) David Arthur Granger. This letter had attracted widespread comments and support from many who have expressed concerns about his leadership style.
They are those who have expressed concerns that the matters raised in the letter and the cause for Mr. Granger’s resignation is akin to washing one’s dirty linen in public. But even as some would prefer not to do so, others counter that democracy within the party is at risk under him. The thinking of this camp is that the Leader, who is a former army officer, has tendencies that are destructive to the party operating as a unified force. Many have also pointed out perceived weaknesses, lack of communication and what they see as his aloof disposition, as reasons for their discontent.
The recently concluded elections have also served as a source of dissatisfaction. Some party faithfuls are also disappointed key leaders were not appointed as Parliamentarians and blame Mr. Granger for this. And whilst the A Partnership for National Unity + Alliance for Change (APNU+AFC) lost power, many in the street have expressed their concern that it is not the lost but the absence of clear direction, swift and effective response from Mr. Granger that bothers them most. It is the opinion that during the Recount when he promised to only accept “valid votes” counted, that at the ninth hour he catapulted. His reason he gave that whilst he does not accept the result he will proceed to a petition. Then later when he failed to sign the petition order in time, thus resulting in this case being dismissed, has been another bone of contention.
There is a feeling, even among ardent supporters of the PNCR, that Mr. Granger should be speaking out against President Irfaan Ali targeting persons employed during his government. It is their view he has remained aloof and silent to what is evidently voiced pains and disappointment by his supporters. It would be fair to say the former President has not defended his government when attacked by the incumbent.
There is no denying Mr. Granger has had some achievements as President which must not be denied him, and which he too has a responsibility to defend. But he seems interested in neither. The sense being gleaned about his leadership is not necessarily who he was as a president, but who he has become as past president and leader of the PNCR which is the main constituent in the APNU+AFC. Mr. Granger cannot ignore those clamouring for him to be more forthright and visible. Whilst there is a Leader of the Opposition, who has a constitutional role, as past president and Leader of the PNCR he too has functions separate and apart to play.
Moments like these people question whether Mr. Granger is really up to the task or interested in the task. Some have argued he is more interested in the titles than the work befitting the titles. It also needs not be forgotten Mr. Granger is dealing with health challenges and may not be fully able to deliver the quality and type of leadership needed at this time. The APNU, which he leads, is not only depleted of parties who left citing discontent with Mr. Granger’s leadership style, but the PNCR is the most significant political force apart from the People’s Progressive Party/Civic. It goes without saying that the PNCR needs strong and vocal leadership. In this regard Mr. Granger’s leadership is of concern and risks being challenged at the Congress whenever it is held.
In an oil and gas economy, where governmental corruption could become a runaway train, and supporters of the PNCR and their communities stand to be excluded from the political economy, this is not time for complacent political leadership and inertia.
