Friday, April 17, 2026
Village Voice News
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Village Voice News
No Result
View All Result
Home Letters

GBTI must revert to the $35 charge at ATM  increase the maximum per transaction to $40,000 

Staff Reporter by Staff Reporter
August 26, 2020
in Letters
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Dear Editor,

Prior to implementing COVID-19 related measures, the Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry (GBTI) charged $35 per transaction connected with the withdrawal of funds from the ATM. The maximum withdrawal per transaction was $30,000 and the daily cumulative amount that could be withdrawn was $100,000.

READ ALSO

Autonomy challenged in life-saving dilemma

Let’s Support The Cuba People

As part of its COVID-19 relief measures, GBTI increased the maximum daily amount to $150,000, but retained the maximum amount per transaction that can be withdrawn. A salutary gesture was the removal of the transaction fee of $35, which was in effect until July 31, 2020. So far, so good!

On Monday, August 24, 2020 I had cause to visit the ATM. I was astonished to find out that while GBTI had retained the $30,000 and $150,000, respectively, it had increased the transaction fee by a whopping 43 percent to $50. So that what we, the customers, thought was a good show of altruism on the Bank’s part, was really a sleight of hand.

GBTI appears to be in a hurry to recoup lost revenue during the 3-month period of “no fees”. The Bank consistently declares multi-billion dollar profits. I am sure the lost revenue is a very small percentage of profit and can be absorbed comfortably, without the need for this grotesque increase in transaction fee, especially at a time when many of its customers are financially-challenged, due to loss or reduced income.

Editor, can you imagine a low income person having to pay $50 on withdrawing $500? In this COVID-19 period? We must remember, too, that the increase was sprung upon the public like a thief in the night, with no notification. This seems to be a pattern in the banking institutions, where it now seems normal to incur a cost for depositing money (including your salary), for withdrawing money, for investing in your future (dormant accounts containing your hard-earned savings could be subject to periodic “no transaction” penalties), for requesting a statement of your account, among several other reasons for instituting fees and penalties.

Editor, I call upon the Bank to revert to the $35 and to increase the maximum per transaction to $40,000 while retaining the maximum daily withdrawal of $150,000. I call upon the Government to develop Consumer Rights legislation that would empower consumers. Without that, consumers will continue to be at the mercy of commercial banks and other financial and quasi-financial institutions. Meanwhile, the Governor, Bank of Guyana is asked to increase his oversight of these institutions and, in the absence of updated legislation, to use his powers to issue “Banking Circulars” to ensure that the actions of the banks do not lead to unintended consequences such as disintermediation.

Yours faithfully
Winston Jordan
Former Minister of Finance

ShareTweetSendShareSend

Related Posts

Letters

Autonomy challenged in life-saving dilemma

by Admin
April 16, 2026

Dear Editor, The agonising decision of whether to transport a friend to hospital against their will is one of those...

Read moreDetails
Letters

Let’s Support The Cuba People

by Admin
April 16, 2026

Dear Editor, Sunday 12 April, I was part of a solidarity march from St Andrew’s Church to the Square of...

Read moreDetails
Letters

Will President Ali, the AG & Finance Minister act on Kickbacks?

by Admin
April 16, 2026

Dear Editor, Would President Ali be kind enough to say how much is enough payback for loyalty of some of...

Read moreDetails
Next Post

Phillips’ portfolio heavier than what Nagmootoo had  


EDITOR'S PICK

Retired Assistant Commissioner of Police Paul Slowe

Slowe slams security breakdown at ‘Baderation’ concert

May 29, 2022
Adam Harris

The Law Can Be Made A Toy

December 6, 2025
Dr. David Hinds- WPA co-leader

David Hinds parts ways with Kaieteur News …says there is an ethnic lobby to push him out

July 31, 2020
Mabaruma Regional Hospital (Richie Singh photo)

Mabaruma doctor who refused to treat sick child relocated to Bartica  

July 19, 2021

© 2024 Village Voice

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Village Voice