Social commentator GHK Lall has widened his critique of governance in Guyana, using the appointment of former acting Chancellor Yonette Cummings-Edwards as Chief Justice of the Turks and Caicos Islands to highlight what he describes as a persistent pattern of sidelining experienced professionals.
Cummings-Edwards’ appointment, effective May 1, follows years of serving as Acting Chancellor of the Judiciary in Guyana without substantive confirmation, despite her seniority and experience. Her tenure was marked by prolonged delays in constitutional appointments, as well as reports that she was forced out of her position following her return from leave, after which she proceeded on early retirement. Her new role represents both a professional elevation and a significant transition after a period of unresolved judicial leadership issues in Guyana.
In his Village Voice News op-ed, Lall framed her trajectory—from leading Guyana’s judiciary in an acting capacity to securing a top judicial post abroad—as both vindication and indictment. “It is said that nobody can keep a good man down. Yonette Cummings-Edwards just proved that that applies to a good woman, as well,” he wrote, while contending that she was removed under “nefarious circumstances, largely political in content.”
Lall extended his argument beyond a single case, pointing to what he sees as a recurring trend involving senior public officials. Among those cited is Dr. Vincent Adams, a highly qualified environmental and petroleum engineer who brought decades of international experience to Guyana, including more than 30 years at the U.S. Department of Energy managing multi-billion-dollar energy and environmental projects.
Appointed Executive Director of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2018, Adams was widely regarded as a key technical figure in overseeing the country’s emerging oil and gas sector. However, shortly after the People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) assumed office in 2020, Adams was sent on extended leave and his contract was subsequently terminated without public explanation—an outcome viewed by some as a significant loss of expertise at a critical time.
Turning to the judiciary, Lall referenced rulings by Justice Sandil Kissoon to illustrate tensions between judicial independence and political reaction. In a landmark 2023 High Court decision against ExxonMobil and the EPA, Justice Kissoon found that the company was operating in breach of its environmental permit and that the EPA had failed in its statutory duty to enforce compliance. He ordered that Exxon provide an unlimited parent company guarantee and adequate insurance coverage, warning that failure to do so placed Guyana and its citizens “in grave potential danger of a calamitous disaster.”
The ruling was widely seen as a strong defence of citizens’ environmental rights, making clear that the burden of any oil spill must fall on the company—not the Guyanese people. However, the decision was swiftly challenged by the PPP/C government, which moved to appeal the ruling, with observers suggesting that Kissoon’s stance placed him at odds with powerful state and corporate interests.
The critique also implicates the administration of President Irfaan Ali, which Lall accuses of undermining institutional independence while publicly lamenting a shortage of national capacity. “Forever is the lament about how much Guyana is lacking in capacity… yet whenever there is opportunity to nurture and retain the scarce capacity in hand, haste to be rid of them has been the norm,” he wrote.
Central to Lall’s commentary is the assertion that institutional standards are being eroded by a culture that prioritises political loyalty over competence. He warned that such a system elevates individuals whose primary role is compliance, potentially compromising decision-making at the highest levels of governance and law.
By linking the experiences of Cummings-Edwards, Adams, and Kissoon, Lall presents what he sees as a troubling pattern in which capable professionals are pushed aside or challenged when their actions conflict with political interests. While individuals like Cummings-Edwards may achieve recognition abroad, he argues that Guyana ultimately bears the cost of their loss, raising broader questions about governance, accountability, and the country’s long-term direction.
