Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice.
At a recent press conference held by the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM), the glaring incompetence of the institution’s leadership was on full display, as both the Chairman, Justice (ret’d) Claudette Singh, and the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Vishnu Persaud, appeared utterly unprepared and disoriented when pressed on key issues. It was not only a public embarrassment but a stark indication of the deep-seated problems within GECOM that threatened the very foundation of future elections in Guyana.
It was painfully evident that the individuals at the helm of this vital institution, entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring free, fair, and credible elections, lack both the vision and competence to carry out their duties effectively. The Chairman, a retired judge who once commanded respect within legal circles, seemed completely disconnected from the pulse of the electoral process. She failed to offer clear answers on critical issues, leaving the public and stakeholders questioning whether she fully understands the tasks at hand.
The CEO’s responses, or lack thereof, were no less concerning. It’s almost as though he was stumbling through the dark, unsure of the direction in which GECOM is headed. This lack of coordination and clarity between the leadership ranks points to a systemic failure within the institution—a failure that could very well spell disaster for Guyana’s upcoming elections.
But perhaps the most damning revelation came from the legal officer, who openly admitted that he is “feeling his way” through the laws and policies of GECOM. This shocking admission indicates that there is no real understanding or application of the legal framework governing elections in Guyana, further undermining the integrity of the electoral process. In essence, the legal officer is fumbling through uncharted territory, leaving the GECOM vulnerable to legal challenges and confusion when critical decisions need to be made.
What is even more troubling is the realization that if this state of affairs continues, there is no way that the elections, especially the 2025 general elections, will be free and fair. With such incompetence at the helm, the prospects of a transparent and credible electoral process seem increasingly distant. The absence of sound leadership at GECOM means that the commission will remain susceptible to internal chaos, legal uncertainty, and public mistrust—factors that will undoubtedly compromise the fairness and credibility of any future elections.
Justice (ret’d) Claudette Singh, who once held the potential to be a stabilizing force in Guyana’s electoral processes, has now become a symbol of failure and inefficiency. Her inability to properly steer GECOM through this critical phase in the nation’s political development calls into question her suitability for the position. If she truly values her integrity, she should step down and allow for fresh leadership to take charge of an institution that is so critical to the democratic fabric of our society.
It is not just the future of elections that is at stake, but the future of our democracy itself. Without competent and accountable leadership, GECOM cannot be trusted to deliver the fair and free elections that every Guyanese citizen deserves. The time has come for Justice Singh and other senior officers at GECOM to do the honourable thing—resign and pave the way for a reformation of the institution before it is too late. Only then can we begin to restore faith in the electoral process and ensure that the voices of the people are truly heard in the next and future election.
