Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice.
Walter Rodney’s How Europe Underdeveloped Africa is a powerful critique of the exploitation and systemic underdevelopment inflicted upon Africa by European powers. This narrative, though centered on Africa, has echoes in the Caribbean, and particularly in Guyana, where political and economic policies have often mirrored the extractive and self-serving practices Rodney condemned. In this context, the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) has played a pivotal role in shaping Guyana’s destiny, but not always for the better.
Walter Rodney’s thesis argued that underdevelopment is not just a lack of development but a result of deliberate actions by external powers to exploit resources and labor. In the case of Guyana, the PPP, despite its rhetoric of development and progress, has often implemented policies that have stunted true national development. By prioritizing short-term gains, foreign interests, and consolidating political power over sustainable growth, the PPP has contributed to the underdevelopment of Guyana.
Resource Exploitation
Just as European powers extracted Africa’s wealth, the PPP’s governance has been marked by a reliance on extractive industries, particularly in mining and now in Oil & Gas and at the expense of long-term economic diversification. Deals with foreign companies have led to exploitation and the depletion of natural resources without significant benefits to the local population, reminiscent of the extractive practices Rodney described.
Lack of Infrastructure and Social Services
Rodney highlighted how colonial powers neglected the development of infrastructure and social services in Africa. Similarly, the PPP’s tenure has seen significant underinvestment in critical infrastructure such as healthcare, education, and transportation, particularly in rural and indigenous communities. This neglect has perpetuated cycles of poverty and inequality, preventing many Guyanese from achieving their full potential.
Dependency and Foreign Influence
One of Rodney’s key arguments was that European powers kept African economies dependent on Europe. In Guyana, the PPP has pursued economic policies that have increased dependency on foreign aid / loans, investment, and imports. This dependency has stifled local innovation and entrepreneurship, keeping Guyana economically beholden to external forces.
Political Manipulation and Social Division
Rodney also discussed the ways in which colonial powers sowed division to maintain control. The PPP’s approach to politics has often exacerbated ethnic tensions and divisions within Guyanese society, particularly between the Indo-Guyanese and Afro-Guyanese populations. By leveraging these divisions, the PPP has maintained political power but at the cost of national unity and social cohesion. This division has undermined collective efforts toward nation-building and has perpetuated a fragmented society.
The underdevelopment perpetuated by the PPP has left Guyana with significant challenges; high unemployment, poverty, emigration, and a lack of opportunities for the youth. These issues are deeply rooted in the political and social structures that have been cultivated over decades and the PPP are simply incapable of changing course at this juncture. Voting the PPP out of office is the only path of relief for the citizens of Guyana. Walter Rodney’s How Europe Underdeveloped Africa serves as a crucial lens through which we can examine the legacy of the PPP in Guyana. While the party has undoubtedly contributed to the nation’s history, its approach to governance continues to mirror the exploitative and divisive tactics that Rodney condemned. For Guyana to truly develop, there must be a shift toward policies that prioritize sustainable development, social unity, and the well-being of all citizens, rather than the perpetuation of power and privilege for a select few.
