The Guyana Human Rights Commission (GHRA) says whilst it welcomes the establishment of the Constitutional Reform Commission (CRC) and wishes it all the best there must be more involvement from civil society.
In a statement issued Saturday the body pointed out that an important early priority of the CRC should be to determine how elected representatives of various sectors will engage with their nominating organisations and through them with the broader public.
“Without maintaining such links with the public, individual representatives will inevitably succumb to the polarising tendencies of political parties which constitute 50% of the CRC membership.” GHRA expressed concern the civic character of the CRC must not be lost.
To ensure inclusive participation GHRA has proposed persons selected to hold regular meetings with the sectors they represent that these meetings to be made public, so that ordinary people clearly know civic representatives’ positions and are provided with opportunities to interact with them.
At the same time, GHRA is calling on civic bodies not to opt out of testing the usefulness of the CRC process. Deepening the democratisation process entails making as much use as possible of limited opportunities, thereby expanding the space available, the body asserted.
The full statement follows:
GUYANA HUMAN RIGHTS ASSOCIATION- PRESS RELEASE
CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM MUST ENCOURAGE POPULAR INVOLVEMENT
Inauguration of the Constitutional Reform Commission (CRC) symbolizes the strengthening of mechanisms capable of shaping political, social and family life in Guyana. Law-making is a civic responsibility, the results of which the legal and political professions are charged subsequently to implement. Reservations about the method of selection or other limitations of the CRC process notwithstanding, the Guyana Human Rights Association (GHRA) welcomes the CRC and wishes it well.
Initiatives that enable people to make political decisions as directly as possible are to be welcomed. Voting in Guyanese national elections is as much symbolism as anyone needs in political life. National elections, for example, are symbolized by cups, trees and other paraphernalia rather than by names or photos of actual candidates, and financing of political activity is disguised in any number of fictions.
An important early priority of the CRC should be to determine how the elected representatives of various sectors will engage with their nominating organizations and through them with the broader public. Without maintaining such links with the public, individual representatives will inevitably succumb to the polarizing tendencies of political parties which constitute 50% of the CRC membership. The GHRA is concerned that the civic character of the CRC must not be lost.
One proposal might be for persons selected to hold regular meetings with the sectors they represent and for these meetings to be made public, so that ordinary people clearly know civic representatives’ positions and are provided with opportunities to interact with them.
Inauguration of the CRC is timely in view of the social tensions being fueled in Guyana by the uncritical embrace of an extreme economic strategy. No country should be adopting this version of capitalism at the present time. Its hallmarks globally are poverty amidst superabundance, disproportionately harming the already worst-off people; forms of work that are alienating and demeaning and finally, a system that has produced the single most potent crisis humanity has ever faced, namely, the climate catastrophe.
In this context, Guyana is crying out for new ideas to replace the exhausted version of ‘prosperity’ that dominates official thinking. The CRC could serve as a platform to articulate alternative visions of human flourishing. The likelihood of this happening has to contend with official hyper-sensitivity over freedom of speech. While getting rid of the economic straight-jacket of ‘marxism-leninism’ from the Party’s constitution, the ruling party explicitly retained ‘democratic centralism’, i.e. the policy of dominant control of the State by the party in power. The profound deficit of democracy that capitalism currently entails in Guyana is rooted in this misguided policy.
In spite of the discouraging context, civic bodies should not use shrinking democratic space as an excuse for opting out of testing the usefulness of the CRC process. Deepening the democratization process entails making as much use as possible of limited opportunities, thereby expanding the space available. Boycotts and non-involvement in Guyanese politics are justifiable in far less circumstances than they are invoked. Politics is an activity and non-engagement is avoidance of activity.
Apart from influencing the substantial issues involved, the CRC provides opportunities for young people and civic organisations to develop political skills so woefully absent among the current crop of politicians.
Executive Committee        Â
Guyana Human Rights Association                                 Â
1 June 2024
