Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice.
A recent statement made by attorney Dexter Todd, who is representing the young rape victim involved in the case against Minister Nigel Dharamlall, has raised concerns about the handling of the matter.
Todd’s remarks have raised concerns over the victim’s rights, legal protocols, and the role of the Crime Chief Wendell Blanhum in making public statements regarding the ongoing investigation.
In his statement, attorney Dexter Todd expressed several concerns regarding the treatment of the young rape victim and the premature handling of the case by the Crime Chief. Todd emphasised the importance of following proper protocols, including having legal representation present during interviews and allowing the victim to speak candidly without fear of repercussions.
He asserted that the victim’s decision not to proceed with the matter should not be perceived as a recantation of her original statement and as such the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) must still act based on the victim’s statement and he further emphasised that the DPP should exercise caution before acting on the victim’s request to discontinue the case. He highlighted the need for a thorough psychological evaluation to ensure that the victim’s decision was made with a clear state of mind. Todd argued that prematurely accepting the victim’s statement without proper psychological assessment would be a deviation from established protocols.
It is also important to note that the Sexual Offences Act of 2010 in Guyana provides important legal provisions pertaining to sexual offences and the testimony of victims. Notably, Section 69(1) of the Act explicitly states that no corroboration is required for the evidence provided by the complainant or child witnesses in sexual offence cases. This means that the court can rely solely on the victim’s testimony without additional evidence to secure a conviction.
The concerns raised by attorney Dexter Todd shed light on the delicate nature of the case and the potential impact on the victim’s well-being. Todd expressed worry over the intense pressure and extensive interrogation that the young victim has been subjected to, highlighting that a 16-year-old should not bear such a burden. He questioned the Crime Chief’s decision to release a public statement without following proper protocols, potentially compromising the Director of Public Prosecutions’ ability to make an unbiased decision.
The attorney further criticised the handling of the victim’s interviews, citing changes in interviewers and repeating the same questions after exhaustive interviews with another agency.
Todd expressed disappointment in the lack of cooperation from certain authorities, preventing the victim from meeting with her chosen legal representatives. He argued that the victim’s rights were not adequately protected throughout the process, leading to a reversal of roles where she was treated as the accused rather than the victim.
The statements made by attorney Dexter Todd have sparked a significant debate about the treatment of the young rape victim and the adherence to legal protocols in Guyana. The case against Minister Nigel Dharamlall has gained international attention, raising questions about the integrity of the investigation process.
As the Director of Public Prosecutions reviews the case, it is imperative to ensure that the victim’s well-being, rights, and access to proper counseling and support systems are prioritized. The outcome of this case will not only impact the individuals involved but also serve as a reflection of the justice system’s credibility in handling sensitive matters of this nature in the future.
