Corruption as defined by Transparency International is “the abuse of entrusted power for private gain.” The Agency warns “Corruption erodes trust, weakens democracy, hampers economic development and further exacerbates inequality, poverty, social division and the environmental crisis.”
In the news again is allegation of alleged wrongdoing by another leader of the A Partnership for National Unity and the Alliance for Change (APNU+AFC) Coalition. While that member has refuted the allegation in a facebook post the Minister of Labour has said to the contrary and has allegedly provided another publication with details of the purported wrongdoing.
It may be easy for some to argue the People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) as a government and party is not without sin, particularly in corruption given the notoriety they brought on Guyana. During their earlier time in government Guyana, for successive years, was ranked the most corrupt country in the English-speaking Caribbean.
The APNU+AFC Coalition was elected to office on a promise to do better. It did start out doing better in combating corruption, removing the shame and disgrace of the stain caused by the PPP/C government. Whilst the allegation of corruption during the term of the Coalition is not as widespread or pales in comparison to the PPP/C, information of this nature is hurting those who expected and voted for better. It is also likely that there will be more allegations of corruption during the term of the APNU+AFC Coalition.
There is also skepticism that future allegations could be brushed aside especially after the accused would take to social media and deny only to have the so-called evidence produced then they go silent.
The Government of Guyana must do better in minimising and eliminating corrupt practices by public officials, particularly elected. The issue of corruption is not only being caught in the malpractice but the importance of shunning the appearance of. The PPP/C is on a studied campaign to rebuild its corrupt image, locally and internationally.
It is folly on the part of the APNU+AFC Coalition not to expect that the slightest appearance of impropriety by any of their members will not be exposed, and where possible magnified. This is understandable in the game of politics, which is competitive, even when played at its cleanest. Being prepared for this would require staying away from practices that could lead to any accusation or the appearance that could cause one to be so accused.
The statement issued by the Alliance For Change (AFC) last week about a national policy to establish standards of ethical behaviour for elected officials is most welcomed. Some would say this call is too late, but it could also be said it is better late than never. The public will look forward to the AFC playing a leading role in conceptualising and implementing this policy. The party has proven its ability to lead in the Opposition before and will be expected to do this again.
There is no greater strength than he (organisation) who recognises a wrong and moves to correct that wrong, even it means holding themselves to account and to a higher standard. It should never be forgotten; elected officials are temporary custodians of the state and the management of its resources on behalf of the people. They must act as such.
