Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo’s recent critical statements about the University of Guyana (UG) not only ring hollow but also betray a startling absence of vision, foresight, and intellectual rigor. His comments, a blend of unwarranted skepticism and political maneuvering, serve only to deepen the chasm between the government’s promises and the educational realities of Guyana.
Vice President Jagdeo’s statements lack the nuanced understanding and respect due to an institution like UG. Labeling the University’s operation and output as inadequate, he seems to engage in an exercise of petty politics rather than constructive criticism. Such remarks come across as a calculated attempt to undermine the institution’s credibility and, by extension, the intellectual capacity of its graduates and faculty.
The PPP’s track record, particularly under the long stewardship of Priya Manickchand in the Ministry of Education, has been far from commendable. The pervasive poor assessment scores in Math and English coupled with the deficient quality of verbal and written communication among Guyanese, reflected in formal writing samples, the embarrassingly high drop-out rates, and the poor quality of education available to the nation’s children–a direct consequence of the educational policies under her watch, speaks volumes. The lack of critical thought among the masses on social media points to a systemic failure in educating the children of Guyana. The minister herself often struggles in these very areas. Additionally, one cannot help but question if the massive failure to adequately educate Guyana’s children represents a deliberate strategy to curtail critical thinking and intellectual advancement, thereby keeping a segment of the population dependent on the party and the PPP government for economic survival.
Vice President Jagdeo’s critique of UG, particularly in light of his acknowledgment of the need for quality first degrees, is perplexing. If quality is the concern, why has the government consistently underfunded the University for decades? The lack of substantial investment in UG starkly contrasts with the financial support extended to regional counterparts like UWI campuses. This disparity raises serious questions about the government’s commitment to higher education and its strategic vision for the country’s intellectual and economic development.
No one can seriously argue about the high caliber of UG’s graduates, many of whom secure employment before graduation and are recognized globally. The insinuation that UG’s output is subpar is not only misleading but also demeans the hard work and achievements of our students and faculty.
According to one brilliant UG professor, “Contrary to the Vice President’s claims, UG’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been anything but confined to online learning. The adaptation to hybrid teaching modes, with significant in-person components, especially in practical and laboratory-based courses, is a testament to the University’s commitment to maintaining educational standards despite unprecedented challenges.”
Jagdeo and Priya must stop their evil machinations involving the University of Guyana. They sound frankly silly and no one is buying their garbage. The government of Guyana needs to engage constructively with UG’s leadership. Providing adequate funding, setting clear benchmarks, supporting research initiatives, and aiding in program accreditation are crucial steps that need to be taken. The government’s role should be that of an enabler, not a detractor.
With the right support, UG has the potential to become a flagship institution in the English-speaking Caribbean. This transformation would not only be a monumental achievement for President Ali’s administration but also a significant milestone in the nation’s educational journey.
Jagdeo’s comments are tiresome and obtuse, and they are a disservice to the intellectual community of Guyana. Intelligent leadership would recognize the University of Guyana’s potential and role in nation-building, rather than diminishing its value through shortsighted political rhetoric. The future of our nation depends on it.
