Dear Editor,Â
In the delicate world of diplomacy, every movement is a message. Usually, a farewell event for a distinguished diplomat like British High Commissioner Jane Miller is a masterclass in decorum—a final toast to partnership, regardless of domestic squabbles. But Friday nite , the script was tossed aside for a display of what can only be described as “Presidential Petulance.”
When President Irfaan Ali and his entourage abruptly exited the room upon the arrival of Azruddin Mohamed, they thought they were making a statement of strength. Instead, they broadcasted a message of profound insecurity to every diplomat and citizen watching.
The atmosphere in the room shifted the moment Mohamed arrived, not because of “sanctions” or “lyrics” from pop-up NGOs, but because of the math. Mohamed didn’t walk into that reception as a mere businessman; he walked in as the man who shattered Guyana’s 70-year political duopoly in 90 days, carrying a 16-seat mandate and 109,000 votes.
President Ali, accustomed to being the only “heavyweight” in the room, suddenly found the scales tipped. The presence of a rival with a massive, growing populist mandate was clearly “suffocating.” Rather than demonstrating the statesmanship required of a national leader, Ali reacted like a spoiled brat at a birthday party who leaves because someone else brought a bigger gift. He didn’t just walk out; he “scooted” back to the safety of State House.
In what can now be deemed as a most rude and uncouth send—off of a friend of Guyana, the most “vile” aspect of the evening was the disrespect shown to High Commissioner Jane Miller. By all accounts, Miller has been an exemplary diplomat, navigating Guyana’s volatile political landscape with balance and brilliance. To have her farewell hijacked by a walkout is a slap in the face to the UK-Guyana relationship.
When the President of a country cannot manage his own emotions long enough to finish a toast to a departing ally because a political opponent is in the vicinity, it signals a breakdown in executive temperament. If the “One Guyana” slogan cannot even survive a cocktail party, how can it survive a nation in transition?
And what was once subtly hidden from the masses, has now been exposed to light, this PPP “band of brigands” should be careful. These infantile displays carry a stark message to the Guyanese people: The establishment is rattled. They are terrified of a leader they cannot control with the old “race-voting” scripts.
- They are terrified of a party (WIN) that snatched their stronghold in Region 7 and flipped their script in Region 10.
- They are terrified of the fact that the room is indeed getting smaller, and the “heavyweights” of the old guard are being pushed to the margins by the weight of a new, unified mandate.
As the light continues to fade on an aging duopoly:
History shows us that when a ruling party begins to act this way—relying on walkouts, using NGOs as “hired guns,” and fleeing from the presence of the Opposition—it is in the final stages of its own hubris. The PPP is beginning to look less like a governing force and more like a cornered animal, snapping at anything that threatens its dominance.
To the people of Guyana: watch the exits. When leaders start running from rooms, it’s because they know they no longer own the floor. The nationwide campaign for change is bearing fruit, and no amount of “scooting home” will change the fact that a new heavyweight has entered the ring
SincerelyÂ
Hemdutt Kumar
