By Mark DaCosta- Elson Low’s recent resignation from his role as treasurer of the People’s National Congress Reform (PNCR) has added to a growing pattern of departures and discontent within the party. As the PNCR grapples with the implications of its recent electoral defeat on September 1, 2025, Low’s decision underscores apparent mounting tensions in the party’s leadership and strategic direction.
Having confirmed his resignation in a Thursday interview with Kaieteur News, Low cited multiple factors for his departure, including his desire to further his studies. While clarifying that he remains a member of the PNCR, he refrained from elaborating on other reasons for his exit, although it is widely acknowledged that his criticism of party leadership played a significant role in his decision. Previously, during an online discussion, he had expressed his distress with the current leadership, stating, “I have been distressed for several months because I have been speaking internally to the party about my real concerns regarding the elections.”
Low’s resignation follows a series of high-profile exits that include the party chairman Shurwayne Holder and several others, making it evident that there are deep-rooted issues that the PNCR leadership needs to address urgently. As the party convened to discuss important matters following its electoral setback, it quickly became apparent that the need for new members on the Central Executive Committee (CEC) had arisen. Low’s departure has prompted discussions on potential replacements, with Christopher Jones and Egerton David already identified as suitable successors. However, party spokesperson Ganesh Mahipaul indicated that the selection process remains under review.
Elson Low, a prominent figure within the PNCR, has had a long-standing affiliation with the party, serving as both the economic advisor to the Leader of the Opposition and a member of its CEC before resigning. His expertise in economics is backed by solid academic credentials, including a dual Bachelor’s degree in Economics and Political Science from Amherst College, as well as a certificate in anti-money laundering and anti-corruption practices from the International Law Institute. Low has also served in notable positions within the public sector, including a junior analyst role at the now-defunct State Asset Recovery Agency.
Low’s recent criticisms of the leadership’s approach have shed light on what he perceives as a disorganised and ineffective strategy within the party. He lamented the lack of a formal process in selecting parliamentary candidates, arguing that such failures have contributed to the recent wave of resignations and dissatisfaction. His calls for reform reflect a wider sentiment that the party’s leadership style must evolve from a top-down directive to one that fosters an environment conducive to success. “Leadership to me is not just a leader telling people what to do; leadership is about creating an environment for success,” he reflected.
Drawing on his professional background in economics, Low has articulated concerns that the nation is faltering in its path to development, particularly given the massive revenues generated from its oil sector. He believes that corruption and incompetence within the government impede effective governance and economic growth, exposing the vulnerability of a substantial portion of the population living below the poverty line. His proposals for significant reforms, such as a substantial increase in public servant salaries and a push for responsible management of oil revenues, further indicate his vision for a more equitable future.
Despite his active engagement in public debates — such as a notable discussion on national development amid newfound oil wealth — Low’s aspirations within the party appear to have been consistently thwarted. Reports suggest he sought a nomination to the Investment Committee for the Natural Resources Fund, a role he was ultimately denied. His growing public profile and impactful critiques reflect an underlying desire for change within the party, yet his resignation raises questions about the effective functioning and cohesion of the PNCR moving forward.
As the party issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to the leadership of Aubrey Norton while dismissing speculation of internal strife, it remains to be seen how the upcoming appointments to the CEC will influence the party’s strategic vision. The PNCR maintains that public grievances expressed by a minority will not derail the party’s ongoing revival efforts. Still, with key figures like Elson Low expressing disillusionment, the road ahead seems fraught with challenges that demand urgent and transparent rectification. As the situation unfolds, those concerned for our nation’s future must keep a watchful eye on the directions taken by its political entities.
