Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice.
By Mark DaCosta- President Irfaan Ali has responded — on behalf of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) regime — to the outrage expressed by Guyanese regarding recalled High Commissioner Charrandass Persaud’s conduct. President Ali’s three and a half minutes long response via video is seen as unacceptable and an insult to the intelligence, sensibilities, and concerns of all Guyanese. Further, the administration cannot ignore the impact of the president’s message that women may be justified in feeling offended and slapped in the face by the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) government
Basically, President Ali said the following:
- He became aware of the fact that High Commissioner (HC) Persaud had been involved in an incident on or about October 25 after he saw the video. The implication is that he had no prior knowledge.
- The president spoke with the HC, who told him that the video did not reflect everything that transpired.
- The president said, “[HC Persaud] agreed with me that he will return home from his posting in India.”
- The president concluded by talking about an orderly transition at Guyana’s High Commission to India.
President Ali’s response raises numerous questions and concerns.
- How could the Government of Guyana be unaware of an allegation of serious abuse against Guyana’s High Commissioner to India more than a year after it happened?
- How was the president not informed of the allegation even as many high level agencies in India were involved since August 2021 (as President Ali said in his video)?
- What did President Ali’s mean when he said that, “Persaud agreed to come home;” was Charandass Persaud recalled or not?
- If the PPP government was unaware of the incident, how is that reconciled with Tuesday’s statement from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs that said that HC Persaud had been cleared and the matter was closed?
The questions and concerns raised by President Ali’s response may be regarded as a ludicrous and feeble attempt to excuse, cover up, and even justify Persaud’s behavior. Further, President Ali’s account of events is far from believable; it is self-contradictory, contrary to logic, and it makes no sense. And, as TV’s Judge Judy famously says, “If it makes no sense it’s a lie.”
Guyanese — particularly women – would note that no apology was made for the conduct of the PPP official. No reprimand of HC Persaud was mentioned. There was no indication of any future investigation. There was no condemnation of Persaud’s conduct. And there is no indication that the PPP regime will, in any manner whatsoever, punish Persaud for the disgrace, embarrassment, and hurt that his actions have caused.
All things considered, Guyanese may be justified in concluding that the president’s response has added insult to injury. Citizens wonder too, in what high paying, luxurious position will Charandass Persaud be placed next by the PPP regime? The question is being asked fully aware of calls, particularly by women, for Persaud not to ever be employed again by the state.
