Saturday, September 30, 2023
Village Voice News
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Village Voice News
No Result
View All Result
Home Editorial

The Shawnette Bollers case  

Staff Reporter by Staff Reporter
May 29, 2022
in Editorial
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice.

The dismissal of a private criminal charge against attorney at law Nirvan Singh by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Shalimar Ali-Hack has understandably outraged many Guyanese.

Singh, an Indo-Guyanese man, is the son of former Chancellor of the Judiciary Carl Singh. It is alleged that on March 20, he used racially hostile language against Woman Constable Shawnette Bollers, who is an Afro-Guyanese. According to the particulars of the charge, Woman Constable Bollers had been on duty at the residence of former Chancellor of the Judiciary, Carl Singh on Middle and Cummings Streets, Georgetown. It is alleged that, by means of words spoken by [Nirvan Singh] in a public place, wilfully excited and or attempted to excite hostility and ill-will against Bollers on the ground of her race as an Afro-Guyanese by using words directed to her and published by him, to wit: “black monkey,” “monkey,” “black people have no purpose in life;” contrary to the provisions of Section 2(1) of the Racial Hostility Act Cap 23:01. Singh was charged; he had pleaded not guilty to the charge in April, and was scheduled to return to court on May 18 having been placed on $100,000 bail.

READ ALSO

Likelihood of PPP becoming increasingly repressive

EDITORIAL: Strained Beliefs…the Unseen Hand in Guyana’s Exxon Audit Reevaluation Debacle

On May 18 Singh made his second appearance in court. On that date, Principal Magistrate Sherdel Isaacs — before whom the matter was to be heard — read a letter addressed to the Chief Magistrate, in which the DPP exercised powers conferred on her by Article 187 (1) of the Constitution of Guyana to discontinue the charge against Singh. As such the charges were dismissed. The DPP offered no reason for the decision. There has since been a loud public backlash and widespread criticism of the DPP’s decision. The DPP has responded by doubling down. Her office issued a statement which said, “We wish to state that the Office will continue to operate in accordance with the Constitution and the relevant laws which are concerned in each case. The Office will continue to uphold the rule of law as it is mandated to do. The Office wishes to inform all persons that the DPP’s Office will not be intimidated or hindered by cheap and baseless attempts on partisan positions in carrying out its constitutional functions.” The statement said, too, “The DPP’s Office reassures the public that it will continue to remain apolitical, and act in a lawful and professional manner devoid of any prejudices.”

This matter raises numerous questions across a wide spectrum of issues. The most obvious issue is that involving race. Mr. Singh, who is clearly the beneficiary of the DPP’s decision is Indo-Guyanese, while his accuser is Afro-Guyanese. One may consider this fact in the context of the current reality. Since the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) came to power in August 2020, there have been allegations of institutionalised racism made against it. Those allegations — too many to count — have been levelled against the regime from a variety of diverse sources. Additionally, despite the DPP’s Office’s claim of being “professional” and “apolitical,” it is generally believed that the PPP has infiltrated almost every facet of society, and has taken — or is in the process of taking — control of every power-base in Guyana. The Office of the DPP is without doubt a significant power base.

Advertisement

Other issues raised by this matter include the fact that Mr. Singh is a man; his accuser is a woman. The backdrop, in this instance, is the general consensus that there is gender inequality in Guyana; women are at a disadvantage. One notes too, that Attorney at Law Singh is the son of a former Chancellor of the Judiciary; his family may be considered wealthy, powerful, and influential. On the other hand, his accuser is a Constable of Police who was, at the time of the alleged incident, guarding the home of the powerful family. Considering the alleged incident within the context of Guyana’s social reality. Is it surprising that citizens are outraged? It would appear that the outrage of Guyanese is not only to be expected, but is entirely justified.



Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice



ShareTweetSendShareSend

Related Posts

Editorial

Likelihood of PPP becoming increasingly repressive

by Admin
September 24, 2023

There is reason to fear that as long as Guyana continues to produce oil, and the People's Progressive Party (PPP) regime...

Read more
Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo
Editorial

EDITORIAL: Strained Beliefs…the Unseen Hand in Guyana’s Exxon Audit Reevaluation Debacle

by Staff Writer
September 22, 2023

It seems the government of Guyana has wandered into a precarious situation concerning the controversial cost audits of ExxonMobil. The...

Read more
Editorial

The perils of economic inequality

by Admin
September 17, 2023

In a previously published article in Village Voice News captioned, "Widening gap between rich and poor in Guyana" the problem...

Read more
Next Post
President Irfaan accompanied by two of his ministers interact with Prime Minister of Barbados Mia Mottley during the opening of the

Pres Ali talks up collaboration to tackle food security, other threats   …as Guyana and Barbados launch “food terminal” for the region 

EDITOR'S PICK

Govt defends multimillion dollar contract with lobbyist firm

January 13, 2021
Minister Ramson and other officials with players of the Demerara, and Berbice teams on Saturday

Inter-County Cricket tournament relaunched after 9-year absence

February 27, 2023

5 new cases of COVID-19 …10 persons remain in COVID ICU

July 7, 2020

Housing is a human right not a commodity

August 7, 2022

© 2022 Village Voice | Developed by Ink Creative Agency

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us

© 2022 Village Voice | Developed by Ink Creative Agency