Sunday, July 20, 2025
Village Voice News
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Village Voice News
No Result
View All Result
Home Editorial

The PPP’s Dangerous Narratives of Democracy

Staff Reporter by Staff Reporter
January 30, 2022
in Editorial
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

One of the terms that has been used a lot in recent public discussions and debates is democracy. Since the last general and regional elections Guyana has been described as a “democracy,” especially by members of the ruling party. It is often said that the rise to power of the PPP in 1992 marked the “return of democracy” and that this “democracy” was rescued with the return of that party to power in 2020. At first glance, these formulations may appear as general statements that are aimed at explaining political developments in Guyana for those not familiar with the country’s historical evolution. But a deeper reading reveals something much more sinister—a partisan attempt to construct narratives that mask the PPP’s intent to dominate Guyana’s political, economic and cultural spaces .

There are two general definitions of democracy. The first definition associated with Western European and American theorists demine democracy in “formal” and “institutional” terms. These include the holding of periodic elections, the existence of functioning intuitions, the principle of representative rule, the rule of law and the principle of majority rule. A second definition referred to as “substantive “ democracy goes beyond the tenets formal democracy to include social and economic equality. Substantive democracy holds that democracy must go beyond forms to include democratic outcomes. Our own Caribbean Scholar, Arthur Lewis, contends that democracy must mean that all those who are affected by decisions must participate in making them. Hence the notion of consensus rather than majoritarian democracy.

READ ALSO

Opposition Must Unite to Defend Electoral Integrity

Fear Is No Longer Working – The PPP Is Running Out of Time

Let us now turn to the PPP’s narratives of democracy. In the first place the narrative that 1992 marked the return of democracy is premised on the assumption that democracy existed before the PNC government of 1964-92 took office. In that regard the PPP is arguing that colonialism, which formally ended in 1966, represented a democratic order. Nothing is further from the truth. How can a system premised on imperialism and lack of self-government be a democracy? The PPP knows this, so it is a case of a convenient and opportunistic formulation.

The narrative of the return of democracy in 1992 therefore is the PPP’s crude attempt to draw a distinction between the PNC’s tenure (1964-92) and its tenure from 1992 to 2015. The truth is that if democracy means the opposite of authoritarianism, then both governments do not qualify as democracies. The PPP’s tenure proves the theory that the end of one authoritarian government does not automatically lead to a democratic form of governance. In fact, it could lead to an expanded form of authoritarianism disguised as “democracy” as was the case under the PPP from 1992 to 2015..
In other words, while there was a change of government in 1992, there was not a change of regime. The State under the PPP bore all the characteristics of the one under the previous government, but it took on another defining characteristic. Under the PPP, the State become fused with Non-State actors in the criminal under-world, thus becoming a Narco-State or what Professor Clive Thomas dubbed the “Criminalized State.” A Narco Criminalized State is by no means a democratic State.

The succeeding APNU+AFC government sought to decriminalize the State and introduce a democratic order. In the process it improved the country’s human rights profile and became the first post-colonial government that did not preside over political assassinations and systematic harassment of political elements. While there were political and economic policies that did not lead to democratic outcomes, these were not systematic. In the end the authoritarian order was not dismantled, but the government presided over a break on hyper authoritarian rule.

Now to the narrative that the outcome of the 2020 election marked the rescue of democracy. Again, the assumption is that democracy existed before 2020. Since the PPP could not be crediting the Coalition government with presiding over a democratic order, it is just a case of loose and convenient language. Even if one accepts the PPP’s argument that there was an attempt to rig the election on the part of the Coalition, the formulation reduces democracy to elections and ignores other aspects of democracy.

Further, if one accepts that elections are the element around which other aspects of democracy revolve, it still reduces democratic elections to declared outcomes and ignores undemocratic inputs such as a bloated list, boxes without accompanying statutory documents, unauthorized votes by absentee voters and other anomalies. Based on a slew of infractions unearthed by the Recount and acknowledged by GECOM, the 2020 election was anything but democratic.

Democracy, therefore, is being used as part of the PPP’s Narratives of good over evil and as part of its mask for domination of politics and society. This is a most dangerous ploy for it has the effect of consolidating autocracy in the name of democracy and criminalizing resistance to this autocracy as unlawful attempts at overthrowing the government. It is therefore imperative that counter-narratives be developed.

ShareTweetSendShareSend

Related Posts

Editorial

Opposition Must Unite to Defend Electoral Integrity

by Admin
July 13, 2025

With less than two months to the September 1 General and Regional Elections, the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) is failing...

Read moreDetails
Editorial

Fear Is No Longer Working – The PPP Is Running Out of Time

by Staff Writer
July 9, 2025

The People’s Progressive Party (PPP) is pushing Guyanese citizens beyond their limit. The old formula of fear and intimidation no...

Read moreDetails
Editorial

President Irfaan Ally Is Not a King – The Svetlana Affair and the Role of a Free Press

by Staff Writer
July 8, 2025

The treatment of journalist Svetlana Marshall by President Irfaan Ali during a recent press engagement was not only unfortunate, it...

Read moreDetails
Next Post
GHK Lall

OP-ED | The Speaker of the House


EDITOR'S PICK

Sergio Ramos had scored all 25 penalties he had taken since May 2018

Ramos misses two penalties on night he breaks a European caps record

November 15, 2020
Google Photo

Chinese defense ministry refutes validity of “Taiwan Strait’s median line”

February 29, 2024

SINCLAIR AND JORDAN PICK UP WICKETS TO CONTROL OPENING DAY

May 24, 2023

Shallow lauds strides made as CWI Unveils annual report and audited financial statements

March 26, 2024

© 2024 Village Voice

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Village Voice