Sunday, March 26, 2023
Village Voice News
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Village Voice News
No Result
View All Result
Home Letters

Chatterjee’s election reflections evolved

Staff Reporter by Staff Reporter
December 8, 2020
in Letters
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice.

Dear Editor

The Canadian High Commissioner to Guyana Lilian Chatterjee’s tenure has come to an end and she is about to depart our shores. The High Commissioner has been working the circuit on courtesy calls and exit interviews; in the latter instance talking politics and of the legacy she leaves here in Guyana.

READ ALSO

Was it PM Mark Phillips or AG Anil Nandlall who advised the president to breach the constitution?

Statement by Bar Association on recent disparaging remarks made against a member of the bar by a sitting judicial officer

One such interview is quite striking. As one could guess, an alleged incident came up for clarity regarding possible interference in the work of GECOM in the early days, post-March 2, 2020. The Newsroom reporter puts the question: “There is a specific allegation that I think you never responded to, I’m not even sure you’ve heard of it, but it was that you were part of a group of persons who stormed the GECOM building at Hadfield Street.”

The High Commissioner responds, “I never stormed any building, or door. I think they said I kicked down the door. I don’t have the strength to kick down any doors. That was pure propaganda and in fact at the time they said I had done that I was actually with my colleagues – the US, the UK and the EU and myself – and at the time they said I was doing that we were meeting with President Granger. Our appointment with him was at 5 o’clock that day, in the evening. And after we met with the President, as a group we went away. We worked on a joint statement together which we put out later that night. We never went back to the Ashmin’s Building when they allege what they allege I had done.”

Advertisement

In a much earlier interview with Gordon Moseley, the identical criticism of the High Commissioner is raised. In the engagement with Moseley she says, “I’ve listened to a lot of nonsense about me kicking the door down, as you know I am a little person, I’d like to think that I am Amazon woman but I certainly did not kick down any doors in that building nor barge into any meetings….”

Gordon asked pointedly, “So there was no barging into any room at any point by yourself? “High Commissioner Chatterjee responds, “Well what happened is when Mr. Mingo started announcing the results the Commissioners were in the meeting where we met with Justice Singh before. It was a glass door and people were shouting and I could see her. I couldn’t see the commissioners, but I could see one of her people in front of the door and I said: Do you think I can inform her what is going on? He said yes, so I knocked on the door, it was a glass door. So, I knocked on the door, she saw me and motioned like this [for her to come]. I opened the door, I actually did not go inside the room, I stood at the door and said, it seems like Mr. Mingo is announcing the Region 4 results. They never said anything. I closed the door and stayed out. I was being respectful. And they actually continued with the meeting.”

High Commissioner Chatterjee continued, “When the shouting and screaming started, when I said that it was right at the beginning, before people started shouting and screaming. As the shouting crescendo started rising the PPP commissioners left the meeting to see what was going on, so she was left in the room with the APNU commissioners. I never intervened beyond that, and I wasn’t intervening. I was just informing her what was going on and the rest of the people. I never asked them to do anything, I just wanted them to know what was happening.”

Editor, any right thinking Guyanese would find those two accounts of the same event qualitatively different. I would hazard that an ambassador should not alter critical portions of accounts and reports of official duty. The High Commissioner’s reflections on her official involvement in election activities in Guyana seem to have evolved with the effluxion of time.

Additionally the High Commissioner was an accredited Observer. We are reminded by The Declaration of Principles for International election Observation and Code of Conduct for International Election, ccommemorated October 27, 2005, at the United Nations, New York, “Observers must not obstruct any element of the election process, including pre-election processes, voting, counting and tabulation of results and processes transpiring after election day. Observers may bring irregularities, fraud or significant problems to the attention of election officials on the spot, unless this is prohibited by law, and must do so in a non-obstructive manner. Observers may ask questions of election officials, political party representatives and other observers inside polling stations and may answer questions about their own activities, as long as observers do not obstruct the election process. In answering questions observers should not seek to direct the election process. Observers may ask and answer questions of voters but may not ask them to tell for whom or what party or referendum position they voted.”

Regards
Sherod Avery Duncan, MP



Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice



ShareTweetSendShareSend

Related Posts

Letters

Was it PM Mark Phillips or AG Anil Nandlall who advised the president to breach the constitution?

by Staff Writer
March 26, 2023

Dear Editor, Last week, it was announced that Prime Minister of Guyana, Mark Phillips, was the one who advised the...

Read more
Letters

Statement by Bar Association on recent disparaging remarks made against a member of the bar by a sitting judicial officer

by Admin
March 26, 2023

Dear Editor, The Bar Association of Guyana notes with significant concern the recent disparagement of a member of the Inner...

Read more
Letters

Christians should never be coerced into sowing seeds

by Admin
March 26, 2023

Dear Editor, Christians should never be coerced into sowing seeds. It is imperative that I write on the issue of sowing...

Read more
Next Post

Guyana is not having a party, CEO Branco

EDITOR'S PICK

lichfield celebrates 180th Anniversary 

November 15, 2020

Transformational Progress’ Needed To Meet Paris Goals, Says COP28 President-Designate

January 16, 2023

THE ASSAULT ON TRUTH

October 10, 2021
The murder suspect at a police station in the North West District

Sophia man killed by Venezuelan woman  

February 13, 2022

© 2022 Village Voice | Developed by Ink Creative Agency

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us

© 2022 Village Voice | Developed by Ink Creative Agency