In a move it describes as leading by example, the Forward Guyana Movement (FGM) has begun removing its banners and flags from utility poles and other public spaces around Georgetown, just days after the conclusion of the September 1 General and Regional Elections.
In a statement posted to social media, last Thursday, the movement reaffirmed its commitment to civic responsibility and environmental respect, even as the campaign season winds down.
“Today, the Forward Guyana Movement began removing our banners and flags from utility poles and other public areas around Georgetown. While we may not have put up as many as other parties, we believe it is our civic duty to act responsibly and ensure that these materials are taken down in a timely manner,” the statement read.
FGM further urged other political parties—particularly those with large-scale campaign visibility—to take similar action in the interest of maintaining public order and aesthetic standards.
“We now call on the other parties—who have erected thousands of these banners and flags, to swiftly begin their removal as well. Left unattended, they quickly become torn, tattered, and unsightly and can even fall and litter our communities.”
The party concluded its statement by reinforcing its values-driven approach to politics.
“FGM remains committed to leading by example and keeping Guyana clean, beautiful, and respectful for all.”
While FGM has taken visible steps to initiate post-election clean-up, the same cannot be said of the other major parties. Chief among them is the ruling People’s Progressive Party (PPP), whose flags, posters, and billboards still dominate much of the public landscape across the country. From lampposts , roadways to entire building façades, the PPP’s campaign materials remain a prominent, and in some areas overwhelming, presence.
This has sparked quiet criticism from residents and observers alike, many of whom note the visual clutter and environmental toll of excessive and uncollected political paraphernalia after elections. With little sign of removal activity by other parties, FGM’s proactive effort sets it apart—and raises broader questions about post-election accountability and civic pride.
As the country moves past the heated campaign period and returns to the rhythm of governance, public eyes now turn not only to the promises made but to the behaviours demonstrated by those seeking to lead.
