By Mark DaCosta- In a recent meeting at the Ministry of Housing, Minister of Local Government and Regional Development, Priya Manickchand, addressed mounting concerns from local vendors over the ongoing development at Stabroek Square. The beautification project, while hailed by government officials, has ignited apprehension among those whose livelihoods rely on this bustling area.
The project aims to revitalise Stabroek Square, a historic site in Georgetown that has long served as a hub for vendors and shoppers alike. Minister Manickchand asserted that the necessity of construction has been communicated effectively, countering claims from the Mayor of Georgetown, Alfred Mentore, that the City Council was left in the dark regarding the details of the developments. In her statement, she emphasised, “This construction will finish in under two weeks,” reiterating the timeframe for the project.
As part of the ongoing works, a video presentation showcased the vision for Stabroek Square, which the minister claims, elicited enthusiastic responses from council members who described the transformation as “lovely, lovely”. However, such positive sentiment does little to pacify the concerns of vendors who fear their businesses could be adversely affected. Despite the Minister’s protests that no vendors would be permanently displaced, there is an acknowledgment that “two vendors could be displaced temporarily” during the construction process.
Minister Manickchand further clarified the reasoning behind the protective barriers erected around the Works; admitting that, while their presence may cause “some alarm,” it is a common safety measure during construction. The Minister’s reassurances underscore the tension between the government’s ambitions and the preservation of the livelihoods that local vendors provide. She also emphasised the Ministry’s commitment to engaging with affected vendors directly, stating that “the Ministry insisted that development must have a human face”.
Despite these assurances, the road ahead appears fraught with conflict, particularly from external parties who may seek to exploit the situation for political advantage. Minister Manickchand implored those on the sidelines to avoid aggravating tensions for “narrow political gain.” The unflinching stance of the government is not only insensitive given the festive season and period when vendors
make the most money, but also indicates a refusal to allow dissenting voices to derail their vision for a revitalised marketplace that they argue will benefit all — vendors, shoppers, and tourists included.
As the government pushes forward with its plans, there is a palpable sense of unease among local traders who rely on the vibrant marketplace of Stabroek Square. Vendors, who have long established their presence in the area, worry that while the square may be adorned with appealing facades and structures, it may also inadvertently distance the very community it seeks to serve. The danger of such developments prioritising aesthetics over accessibility looms large.
Many vendors voiced their frustration, stating that their input appears overlooked in the planning stages of this project. The Minister’s assurances about engaging with vendors directly will need to manifest into tangible actions to quell worries of displacement and disruption. Residents and local traders alike are left with a sense of uncertainty as to whether their concerns will genuinely be considered or simply brushed aside in the name of progress.
The government’s decision to forge ahead with the beautification of Stabroek Square has drawn both praise and concern. While the Minister presents a united front in supporting local redevelopment, the implications for vendors remain controversial.
