Sunday, October 12, 2025
Village Voice News
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Village Voice News
No Result
View All Result
Home Global

UPS, FedEx warn they cannot carry ballots like U.S. Postal Service 

Staff Reporter by Staff Reporter
August 16, 2020
in Global
US President Donald Trump

Former US President Donald Trump  

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
US President Donald Trump

 

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – United Parcel Service and FedEx on Friday shot down social media calls that they step in to deliver mail-in ballots from the U.S. Postal Service, which is warning states of potentially “significant” delays.

READ ALSO

China reports major improvements in welfare for children, elderly over past five years

Israel and Hamas Reach U.S.-Brokered Ceasefire Agreement

“State ballots must be postmarked to be considered valid and only the USPS has lawful postmarking status. Therefore UPS, FedEx and other private parties cannot technically be involved in shipping ballots,” UPS told Reuters in a statement.

“FedEx does accept individual ballots, and we advise that customers planning to return their ballots via FedEx should closely review their state’s guidelines on absentee voting and deadlines for ballots or related election documents,” FedEx said. Republican President Donald Trump on Thursday said he opposed providing funds for the struggling Postal Service for mail voting, which is expected to surge to 50% as the coronavirus pandemic rages ahead of the Nov. 3 presidential election.

The Postal Service said on Friday it has written to 46 states and the District of Columbia warning there is a significant risk voters will not have enough time to complete and return their ballots. In a viral Twitter post here on Thursday, author and radio host David Rothkopf said there was a “big opportunity” for UPS and FedEx to deliver ballots for free. “You’ll overnight become the most beloved and respected organization in America,” he wrote.

Various laws and regulations for the most part prohibit private delivery companies from handling mail-in and absentee ballots, the companies and experts told Reuters. Exceptions include deliveries deemed “extremely urgent” by statute and deliveries on the day of and afternoon prior to election day.

In some states, collection would be prohibited because it would be considered “ballot harvesting,” said Tammy Patrick, a former Arizona election official and senior advisor to the Democracy Fund foundation.

There are other hurdles that those companies, already coping with a pandemic-related surge in e-commerce shipments, would have to overcome. For example, the Postal Service touches every U.S. mailbox six days a week. Private companies visit only when they have a delivery or an pre-arranged pickup – and they do not have blanket coverage in rural areas.

Representatives from Amazon and the Postal Service did not immediately respond to requests for comment.  “Establishing a protocol of how they would collect the ballots would be a challenge,” Patrick said.

Domestic costs would skyrocket since delivery firms charge significantly more for deliveries than the price of a 55-cent stamp, which is the cost to return many ballots. And, international costs would be “astronomical,” Patrick said.

ShareTweetSendShareSend

Related Posts

Lu Zhiyuan, China's minister of civil affairs, speaks during a press conference held by the State Council Information Office (SCIO) on achievements in civil affairs during the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021-2025) in Beijing, China, October 10, 2025. /Xinhua
Global

China reports major improvements in welfare for children, elderly over past five years

by Admin
October 10, 2025

Over the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021-2025), welfare for children and the elderly in China has seen significant improvements, China's...

Read moreDetails
A man waves Palestinian flags as Palestinians react to news on a ceasefire deal with Israel, in Deir Al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip, January 15, 2025.
Global

Israel and Hamas Reach U.S.-Brokered Ceasefire Agreement

by Admin
October 10, 2025

In a breakthrough announced this week, Israel and Hamas have agreed to the first phase of a United States (U.S.)-mediated...

Read moreDetails
Venezuela's opposition leader Maria Corina Machado
Global

Venezuelan Opposition Leader Triumphs with Nobel Peace Prize

by Admin
October 10, 2025

By Mark DaCosta- In a significant turn of events that echoes beyond Venezuela’s borders, María Corina Machado, a prominent figure...

Read moreDetails
Next Post
Thousands complained that the state broadcaster gave a skewed picture of the protests 

Battling protests, Lukashenko says Putin agreed to help security of Belarus 


EDITOR'S PICK

WORD OF THE DAY: MALADROIT

February 14, 2024

WORD OF THE DAY: LIMPID

July 15, 2024

Nation Building Guyana Beyond 2030: A Conversation with Stanley Ming

June 16, 2025
Former Prime Minister and Mayor Hamilton Green (New Source Photo)

We have an oligarchy pushing us to the disaster of a dictatorship

December 19, 2022

© 2024 Village Voice

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • Future Notes
    • Blackout
    • From The Desk of Roysdale Forde SC
    • Diplomatic Speak
    • Mark’s Take
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • The Herbal Section
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Book Review 
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us

© 2024 Village Voice