Thursday, August 11, 2022
Village Voice News
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • For Your Attention
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Mark’s Take
    • Future Notes
    • Children & Youth
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Jacobs On Agriculture
    • Book Review 
    • My Turn Guyana
    • The Herbal Section
    • ECHO
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • For Your Attention
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Mark’s Take
    • Future Notes
    • Children & Youth
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Jacobs On Agriculture
    • Book Review 
    • My Turn Guyana
    • The Herbal Section
    • ECHO
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Village Voice News
No Result
View All Result
Home Columns

‘What effrontery?’

Staff Reporter by Staff Reporter
July 4, 2021
in Columns, Future Notes
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice.

Stabroek News reported that ‘Attorney General (AG) Anil Nandlall, in a statement on behalf of government, accused the PSC (Police Service Commission) of countermanding, disobeying and disregarding the President’s decision, which he said, ‘not only amounts to an effrontery to the highest executive office in this land, but is simply absurd.’ Mr. Nandlall speaks of the president as if he is all-powerful, but it is well recognised that even in the United States where the constitution clothes the president with executive supremacy, his power is sometimes questioned, and it is doubtful if a democracy can flourish where there is one supreme executive overlord.

Most briefly, the AG was referring to the quarrel between the government and the PSC concerning the promotion of certain police officers. For reasons having to do with ongoing disciplinary matters, the PSC had left a few of the government’s preferred officers off the promotion list and this led to the dispute. The affected officers took the PSC to court to prevent it from proceeding with the appointments and leaving them off the list but lost their case. In the meantime, the president sought to suspend the PSC but his order was ignored on the grounds that he did not follow the required procedure, and the PSC proceeded with the appointments.

READ ALSO

‘The PPP now knows’ 

African Guyanese demand equitable distribution of the nation’s patrimony

Recently I heard the AG give an example of decision-making in the normal boss/employee relationship, suggesting that barring an injunction, once the president gives an order it must be complied with. Public management will be seriously jeopardised if superior orders can be routinely flouted but subordinates confronted by what they consider illegal orders have the duty to communicate their objections to their superiors all the way up the decision chain. Applied to the boss/employee relationship posited by the AG, this would indeed mean that the Commission should have first taken to the courts before making the appointments. 

But the Guyana political system is rooted in the existence of certain fundamental individual rights and the separation of powers, and the independent service commissions are there to help to protect those rights. Article 226(1) of the Constitution states that ‘in the exercise of its functions under this Constitution a commission shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other person or authority.’ Where in any normal boss/employee relationship is the employee empowered not to be directed by the boss? 

Advertisement

The PSC is that type of constitutional body that is not an executive subordinate of the president, and the constitution of Guyana is littered with instances that speak to the special nature of the service commissions. For example, article 232 (5) states that, together with other bodies such as the offices of President, the Minority Leader, Ombudsman, members of the National Assembly, the members of the service commissions are not public servants. Commissioners cannot be members of the National Assembly and as with other such autonomous bodies, article 225 (6) makes similar provisions for the disciplining of their members. It is this process that the PSC is claiming the president breached. 

If ‘good faith’ existed between the parties, the PSC could have asked the court to determine the legality of the president’s order and its decision to go forward. However, the air is devoid of such niceties, the PSC’s term ends in a month and given the operation of our legal system it is uncertain that a timely decision would have been provided. Since it is not subordinated to the president and the court cleared the way for it to proceed if it wished to make the appointments, it took the sensible course.  The government has said that it will ignore the decision of the PSC and if by this it means that it will not abide by and will seek to undermine the normal implications of the appointments it will most likely have to answer for such behaviour in the courts. Of course, this kind of standoff contributes to organisational alienation and disunity, particularly as if it does not win the legal battle, the regime will certainly try to find administrative ways of working around the PSC’s decision.

There has been no effrontery. Never mind the persistent corruption of these commissions by the political elite who usually pack them with their supporters – even members of the central executive committees of their parties – they are autonomous bodies intended to help protect the fundamental rights of Guyanese and they should be encouraged to do all that is necessary to defend and enhance their independence.



Support Village Voice News With a Donation of Your Choice



ShareTweetSendShareSend

Related Posts

Future Notes

‘The PPP now knows’ 

by Staff Writer
August 9, 2022

Like many autocratic regimes, simply because it ‘won’ supposedly free and fair elections, the PPP would like to consider itself...

Read more
The Crosshair

African Guyanese demand equitable distribution of the nation’s patrimony

by Staff Writer
August 7, 2022

Without a doubt, Guyana, with its vast resources, and jocularly tabbed “Little Dubai,” because of its recent oil discovery, is...

Read more
Google Photo
The Herbal Section

Crab Oil (Andiroba)

by Staff Writer
August 7, 2022

Andiroba is a plant. The bark and leaf, as well as oil from the fruit and the seed, are used...

Read more
Next Post

Why we are eternally indebted to Haiti and Haitians  

POPULAR NEWS

No Content Available

EDITOR'S PICK

Royals stumble at the start

Smith won the toss in the first day-game of the season, and batting first seemed the right decision given the sapping heat. However, Royals couldn't make the most of that advantage with their top three gone within ten balls of each other. Buttler looked good during his brief stay, but Smith and Samson didn't last long enough for even a brief sparkle.

Samson's dismissal required several replays, with the third umpire trying to determine whether Chahal had got his hands under the ball while diving full-length to his right. The soft signal on the field was 'out', and the third umpire eventually ruled that the images didn't provide enough evidence to overrule the on-field call, which gave Chahal his first wicket.

The Royals sent in Robin Uthappa at No.4, but if the move was intended to give some stability, it didn't quite have the desired effect. Far from his fluent best, Uthappa couldn't get going, and ended with his third score of less than a run a ball in four matches so far this season.

Lomror, Tewatia lead recovery

Royals had gone with Mahipal Lomror for this game ahead of Ankit Rajpoot, bringing in a batsman who could bowl occasional spin for a seam bowler, and Lomror repaid that faith with a robust innings of 47. At the death, the big-hitting pair of Rahul Tewatia and Jofra Archer smashed four sixes between them to push the Royals past 150. But with Tom Curran not getting a bat and Tewatia and Archer facing only 22 balls between them, it left questions about the Royals batting order, and whether they would have been better served by sending in quicker scorers earlier.

Padikkal starts, Kohli finishes

In only his fourth IPL innings, Padikkal powered to his third half-century. He looked at ease from the start of this innings, effortlessly picking up Jaydev Unadkat for six over deep midwicket second ball. He lost Aaron Finch in the third over, lbw to a Shreyas Gopal googly, but Kohli joined him for a match-winning stand. The two would go on to put up 99 runs in 80 balls. Kohli could afford to take his time and play himself in, with the asking rate not too high and Padikkal stroking the ball freely.

Padikkal lost his stumps to Archer - easily the best Royals bowler on show - when he was stepping away to make room, but de Villiers joined Kohli to knock off the remaining runs comfortably.

Virat Kohli and Devdutt Padikkal lead Royal Challengers Bangalore to third win

October 4, 2020
A person receives the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine in the United States [Ted Shaffrey/AP Photo]

Moderna says COVID vaccine works against coronavirus variants

January 26, 2021
Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman made the announcement in Riyadh

Saudi Arabia commits to net zero emissions by 2060

October 24, 2021

The Bath Settlement Killing

September 21, 2020

© 2021 Village Voice | Developed by Ink Creative Agency

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Letters
  • Global
  • Columns
    • Eye On Guyana
    • For Your Attention
    • Hindsight
    • Lincoln Lewis Speaks
    • In the village
    • Mind Your Business
    • Mark’s Take
    • Future Notes
    • Children & Youth
    • Bad & Bold
    • The Voice of Labour
    • Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds
    • Talking Dollars & Making Sense
    • Jacobs On Agriculture
    • Book Review 
    • My Turn Guyana
    • The Herbal Section
    • ECHO
  • Education & Technology
  • E-Paper
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Village Voice | Developed by Ink Creative Agency